Are ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’, ‘Amazing Spider-Man 2′, ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ Becoming Overcrowded?

With Iron Man 3 recently hitting the box office in big way, and Man of Steel and The Wolverine quickly on their way, it’s hard for one’s attention not to be firmly set to the pending comic book movies that we’re more than happy to accept with open arms into our wallets. As much as we as viewers, though, love and want nothing but the best for these type of films, one must sit back and ponder: are some of these movies in danger of becoming overcrowded, which is the last thing movies like this should be. The most obvious and pressing of these are X-Men: Days of Future PastThe Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy. 

Wind the clock back to 2006 with Brett Ratner’s massive flop X-Men: The Last Stand, which was universally scorned by critics and audiences alike. If you were to ask anyone that’s seen that travesty-of-a-movie, nine times out of ten they’ll mention how it had far too many characters that clogged the film up and was simply unable to juggle all of them successfully. The three upcoming movies that I listed above are in danger of that very same thing.

hugh-jackman-x-men-days-future-past-cast (1)

Take X-Men: Days of Future Past; not only does it have the cast of X-Men: First Class to deal with (which includes James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence, and Nicholas Hoult), but also the cast of the original X-Men (which includes Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry, Anna Paquin, Ellen Page, Shawn Ashmore, and Daniel Cudmore) through a rumored time-travel plot that’s sure to make things interesting. As if that wasn’t a large enough cast to begin with, there’s also three prominent newcomers: Omar Sy, who Indiewire has confirmed is playing time traveling, sentinel-fighting mutant Bishop; Peter Dinklage of Game of Thrones fame, who most assumes is playing sentinel creator Bolivar Trask; and Evan Peters, who will be playing Pietro Maxinoff, AKA Quiksilver, AKA Magneto’s son. That’s quite a hefty cast, but director Bryan Singer (the director of X-Men and X2) has proven in the past that he’s a talented storyteller and more than capable of pulling that delicate balancing act off, despite what Jack the Giant Slayer may suggest).

jamie-foxx-the-amazing-spider-man

Then there’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2. The cast that are returning from The Amazing Spider-Man is relatively small in comparison to the newcomers entering the picture. From the first are Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Martin Sheen (for some reason), and Sally Field. The newcomers’ list is significantly longer: Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborn, Shailene Woodley as Mary Jane Watson, Jamie Foxx as Electro, Paul Giamatti as The Rhino, Chris Cooper as Norman Osborn, and Felicity Jones, B.J. Novak, and Colm Feore in unknown roles. That’s a heavy docket for any director to deal with and I’m not entirely convinced that director Marc Webb is capable of rising to the occasion. Granted, it’s nearly impossible to predict what kind of capacity any of these characters might have in the overall scheme of the film, but it is cause for at least some concern.

Guardians_of_the_galaxy

One mac-daddy unknown exists in all of this and that is Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy. The core cast that we know who will be playing whom is Chris Pratt as Star-Lord, Zoe Saldana as Gamora, and WWE wrestler Dave Bautista as Drax the Destroyer. I wish that I knew enough about Guardians of the Galaxy to be able to describe who these characters are, so the names themselves will have to do for now. The other actors who could be playing only-God-knows-who is John C. Reilly, Karen Gillan (from Doctor Who), Lee Pace, Ophelia Lovibond, and Glenn Close. This isn’t a troublesomely large cast (yet), but this is one that will be a hard pill to swallow, regardless of how many actors are in it. Even if the cast only consisted of the Guardians of the Galaxy themselves, that’s still a task in and of itself. The goal of all of these Marvel/ Avengers movies is to introduce you to characters before they’re all plopped into one film together. Guardians of the Galaxy‘s job, in that case, is already much more difficult than that of Thor‘s, which some might argue didn’t do a great job of getting that character, either, and that was just one character. Guardians of the Galaxy has five! Did I mention one of them is a talking raccoon, too?

Is the fate of any post-Avengers to plop as many characters into a movie and just hope for the best? The Avengers director Joss Whedon was talented at balancing screen time for characters. Bryan Singer, Marc Webb, and Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn are clearly all very talented people, but it’s crazy to expect them, or any director for that matter, to have that same skill.

Do you smell doom for X-Men: Days of Future PastAmazing Spider-Man 2, and/or Guardians of the Galaxy? Leave your thoughts in the comments.

- Drew Koenig

If you like what we do, please recommend or like us on Facebook 

By Drew Koenig

Drew Koenig lives in Cincinnati, OH where he can likely be found defending Lost, getting excited over a great that his friends will never see, and refusing to watch Signs after the sun has gone down. Drew hopes to one day finish writing a book or screenplay, whichever gets done easier. He also writes for his personal movie blog MovieBuffHaven.com and writes movie reviews for TheMovieBuff.net. You can follow him on Twitter: @_drewkoenig and let him know he's an idiot

Follow on Twitter

Connect on Facebook

View all Posts

Visit Website

Share This Post

Google1DeliciousDiggStumbleuponRedditRSSTumblrPinterest

Around the world wide web

Back

7 Responses to Are ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’, ‘Amazing Spider-Man 2′, ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ Becoming Overcrowded?

  1. Bill Mesce June 8, 2013 at 10:41 am

    I’ve brought this up before in other threads, but what never ceases to amaze me is how needlessly nasty critical comments get to be, and along with that, how unforgivingly rigid and sometimes narrow-minded in their judgment those comments are as well.
    X-MEN 3: Do the homework and yeah, it was a critical dud, but a moneymaker ($234.4 million domestic, $449 worldwide against a budget of $210 m). I don’t know that Andrew had to point that out the way he did.
    In fact, I’m hard put to see why anybody here made their comments — which, by the way, I’m not disagreeing with — the way they did.
    The people who contribute to this site are not paid journalists. They come here out of little more than a passion. Do they sometimes get stuff wrong? Yeah, sure. Even highly paid pros do. I don’t know if that’s an excuse to let the attack dogs out.
    Do they sometimes offer arguable opinions? Well, they’re opinions — they’re supposed to be arguable. Drew offered up an opinion worth debating, but there’s a difference between a spirited debate and a bitch-fest.
    I don’t know if it’s the anonymity of the Internet and the safety of distance, or the idea of respectful debate has come to be considered antiquated and relegated to the realm of old fartdom, but I don’t see how this had to go nuclear so quickly and for no particularly good reason.

    Reply
  2. John Hawken June 7, 2013 at 12:38 am

    Critics… who the hells needs them. Its easy for someone to complain about a movie when they arent the ones trying to make everyone happy. True! X3 sucked a fat one! Origins could have been a little more about Wolverine but the Deadpool plot wasnt as bad as everyone is complaining about! And the fact that atleast these studios and directors are trying to make us REAL comic fans (not you cry babies that want 9 hours of comic packed in 2 hours of movie) happy by their visions makes me appreciate the movie even more! So shut the hell up with your bitching and save your money and go see The Notebook 2… whereyour crying will be appreciated with all the other snifflers!

    Reply
  3. grimlock June 6, 2013 at 9:09 am

    unless you’r a moron x1,2 AND 3 were pile of crap, the plots were massively dumbed down for a general audience way more then they should have been. but the fact the writer doesn’t know bout guardians is mega fail, as if he read the comics would know a guardians film won’t be hard for marvel studios cos of what the characters are like. the only one out of the 3 that will be terrible is xmen, since marvel have alerady proved that when you appeal too the comic fans and keep it true you get alot more money an gd feedback.

    Reply
  4. Reuben June 6, 2013 at 6:10 am

    Who cares? Or more accurately, who should care? Comic book movies have become predictable and bloated in the extreme. Films where every hero is inherently guaranteed safe passage to the end of the film, meaning (or perhaps because) they can simply return in seemingly indefinite, infinitely bloated sequels to fill studio pockets with more blandly-earned cash? It’s a paper-thin artifice any self respecting, intelligent person should see through in a second.

    Reply
  5. Andrew June 6, 2013 at 4:13 am

    massive Flop? Lol yeah right you are a joke of a journalist Xmen the last stand was actually a Massive hit you biased moron and actually made more money then X1 And X2! Lol wow troll idiots are writing articles now. Your a jackass!

    Reply
    • Deepayan Sengupta June 6, 2013 at 6:37 am

      It is intelligent, thought-provoking commenters like you that make what we do worthwhile.

      Reply
    • Edgar Chaput June 6, 2013 at 7:26 pm

      ‘Jackass’ was a pretty funny show. I wouldn’t take that as an insult necessarily.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back