‘The Hunger Games’ a highly ambitious, grounded, intelligent, emotionally gratifying blockbuster

The Hunger Games
Directed by Gary Ross
Screenplay by Gary Ross, Suzanne Collins and Billy Ray
2012, USA

In a dystopian future, the Capitol of the nation of Panem randomly selects twenty four of the country’s youngest inhabitants to fight to the death in a yearly event titled The Hunger Games. The film’s tagline – “The World Will Be Watching” – refers to the televised titular contest, which the government uses to maintain order.

Two “tributes” from each of twelves districts, a boy and a girl, must participate until only one is left standing. Sixteen year old Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) of District 12 (the coal mining district that fuels the Capitol) volunteers in her younger sister’s place, and is left to rely upon her sharp instincts and the mentorship of drunken former Hunger Games victor Haymitch Abernathy (Woody Harrelson) . If she is ever to return home, Katniss must make impossible choices in the arena that weigh survival against morals, humanity, and love.

“The only thing stronger than fear is hope.”

- President Coriolanus Snow, The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games certainly isn’t in need of anymore publicity. Given the disappointing results of John Carter, Games is really the first big movie event of 2012. Collins’s best-selling novel, the first in a trilogy of books, has sold over 26 million copies in the U.S. alone and the novel was featured for more than 180 consecutive weeks on the N.Y. Times bestseller list. As with any project of this magnitude, the question is whether this global phenomena would translate well to the medium of film. The answer to that question is a roaring yes.

This is a highly ambitious, grounded, intelligent, intriguing, thoughtful, emotionally gratifying blockbuster, which doesn’t pander or speak down to its primary target audience – how refreshing is that? Director Gary Ross (Pleasantville, Seabiscuit) doesn’t play by the typical rules of franchise building and abandons a glossy, romanticized mainstream feel opting instead for stark emotional realism. Ross is more concerned with the human element of the story, rather than the spectacle, Hunger Games features a compelling central character and a strong narrative structure, replete with sharp observations about the politics of democracy, authoritarianism and the various dangers of fascism.

It helps that the screenplay was, for the most part, penned by both Ross and the author of the book, Suzanne Collins. The text is thematically provocative, and its allegorical elements are superbly executed, highlighting the way the Games amplify today’s obsession with reality television. The Games represents the Capitol’s twisted idea of mass entertainment as well as the idea of TV as a mode of state control over the populace, so despite its futuristic setting, Hunger Games serves as a timely and effective parable of the way we live today.

Hunger Games is certainly not using an original concept. Apart from the obvious comparison to Kinji Fukasaku’s gloriously sick and twisted masterpiece Battle Royale, one can point out borrowings dating as far back as Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game to Stephen King’s The Running Man, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, the French flick Le roi des ondes Louis XIX (later remade as The Truman Show) and even Spartacus, a film based on actual events. But despite its well-worn concepts, Ross’s adaptation still feels fresh, and more importantly has something those other stories don’t have: an effective love-triangle of sorts, between Katniss and two vastly different boys. Hunger Games is an unlikely coming-of-age story in which a teenage girl finds love and self-confidence in the deadliest of situations. While Katniss harbours secret feelings for Gale (Liam Hemsworth), her best friend from back home, her relationship with Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) develops and deepens as they fight to survive, thus forming the love triangle that attracted so many readers of the original source material.

Half the battle of filmmaking is proper casting, and matching the right talent to the already well-fleshed out characters of the book wasn’t easy. Ross pulls together an all-star cast who all deliver in spades. At the heart of it all is Jennifer Lawrence, who is astounding, occasionally letting Katniss’s vulnerablity show through, while retaining her overall strength. Katniss is the anti-Bella Swan from Twilight; she is smart, strong, resourceful, self-reliant and never defined by her relationship or lack thereof to a male counterpart.

Ross’s decision to film The Hunger Games with docu-drama/shaky-cam techniques won’t please everyone. Longtime Clint Eastwood collaborator and cinematographer Tom Stern shoots key sequences in this style that would be just as effective if shot with a tripod. It’s also clear that the need for a PG-13 rating likely influenced that aesthetic choice; a film vividly depicting the events of the book would certainly carry an R. It takes some getting used to, and admittedly one is left to wonder why there is so much of it, but somehow it reflects well on the tensions and hostilities of the story. If anything it conveys the immediacy and first person point-of-view from the book. We see flashes of weapons being used, blood splattering, whimpers and cries and sometimes screams – Ross finds every which way to convey the horror without the graphic detail.

The way Ross etches life in District 12 feels authentic and lived-in. Meanwhile in the Capitol, Philip Messina’s production design is consistently impressive creating bold set-pieces, a look he likes to call “retro-futuristic.” Its quite a visual spectacle, as are the costumes and makeup, most notably that of Stanley Tucci playing the darkly funny Caesar Flickman, a cross between the Joker and a future Jay Leno. The score, a joint venture between composer James Newton Howard and executive music producer T Bone Burnett, is fantastic, as is the soundtrack, which features a hauntingly atmospheric track by Arcade Fire.

As for Peeta, there’s a lot to admire about Hutcherson’s performance. He’s an inherently good person, easy on the eyes and packs physical strength, but more importantly we completely believe in his love for Katniss. The film manages to achieve a strong surge of emotion from most of the cast, especially with the youngest tribute, a girl named Rue (played brilliantly by newcomer Amandla Stenberg), responsible for the film’s most powerful scene. And while the entire cast is great, a special mention needs to be made for Lenny Kravitz, the only actor who could, even if for a moment, steal the spotlight from Lawrence.

The Hunger Games is emotionally engaging from start to finish. It’s less than a masterpiece, but it’s deserving of the ubiquity it’ll no doubt earn upon release.

Ricky D

 

 



By Ricky da Conceição

Some people take my heart, others take my shoes, and some take me home. I write, I blog, I podcast and I edit.

Follow on Twitter

Connect on Facebook

View all Posts

Visit Website

Share This Post

Google1DeliciousDiggGoogleStumbleuponRedditRSSTumblrPinterest

Sound On Sight Podcast

Back

4 Responses to ‘The Hunger Games’ a highly ambitious, grounded, intelligent, emotionally gratifying blockbuster

  1. Larry Bierman August 4, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    I am one who simply cannot take shaky-cam films. I had to walk out thirty minutes into the movie because it was making me sick. I suggest the the movie industry come up with a new rating letter — “D” for Dramamine.

    Reply
  2. tmack March 24, 2012 at 11:58 am

    I did see The Hunger Games yesterday–a good film that could have been much better with a little tweaking and perhaps with a slightly different vision. One of its biggest flaws in my view was the absence of a knowable, equally matched or better matched antagonist among the tributes. Kateniss is always seen fighting a mob or unseen opponent, so we never really feel she’s in danger or incapable of taking care of herself. What we needed was an adversary for her that we developed an attachment to, maybe that we even admired and had some ambivalent feelings for. The casting and character development of Kato, the last fighter, should have been just as important as the casting of Kateniss & Peeta imho, and would have made the last stand much more heart stopping, even tragic.

    Sure, you could say that the opponents were the rulers who orchestrated the games. But they are far removed from the field of battle and we never feel anything for Sutherland’s son, do we. Their problems aren’t with the opponents but with each other.

    A film like The Hunger Games has to get through the trope of “They Can’t Kill Off the Hero/Heroine of the Film.” Ross tries his best in manufacturing tension around Peeta, but Peeta’s not the star. Kateniss’s journey is too predictable without an equal or superior opponent.

    I think you’re right in observing Ross’s deficiencies as an action director cuz no action director would have made this error in omitting an opponent for Kateniss.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: The Hunger Games - Page 3

  4. Edgar Chaput March 20, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Very well. I shall ‘proceed with caution.’ I won’t lie, the trailers and tv spots did absolutely nothing for me, other than perhaps confuse me further as to what the movie is about. Your review is encouraging though.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back